On Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:43:38 -0500, you wrote:
>
> No, real windows behaviour was not checked.
>
> To tell the truth, this part of the patch "seemed" right, but turned out not
> to be required to fix my bug. So if it does break things, I have no
> objection to it being removed, as long as the rest of it (in
> SWP_CopyValidBits) isn't touched.
>
> I don't really have time to create a new patch right now, so if someone else
> (Rein?) wants to go ahead, please feel free.
I tested this today under real windows. As I suspected, the subject
code is actually wrong, as far as it changes the conditions for the
clearing of the SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE bit.
I'll send in the patch.
Rein.
--
Rein Klazes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
