Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You think four would be better? If we let wine-utils mostly contain stuff
> from programs/, then it seems a five-way-split is reasonable, and I can't
> think of a lot of scenarios where it would be confusing. (Debian packages
> do have fields such as "Recommends" and "Suggests", too.) It's common in
> Debian to split packages (maybe too common) (maybe that's why their
> package count is so high), which must probably be for good reasons.
> But if you have a concrete suggestion...?
I think merging wine and libwine would be better, because nearly all
the binaries from the wine package are required for libwine to work
properly. Otherwise you need to have wine depend on libwine and
libwine depend on wine, which I'm not sure makes a lot of sense.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
