"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should we move ts_*.h and x11*.h to include/wine?
>
> What about include/bitmaps/* to graphics/x11drv/bitmaps?
> (but than again, graphics/x11drv/* should probably go to dlls/x11drv, so
> maybe we should move them directly to dlls/x11drv/bitmaps)
XPM bitmaps should be removed and replaced by resources IMO.
> And stuff like: builtin16.h, callback.h, config.h, debugdefs.h,
> debugtools.h, dosexe.h, drive.h, elfdll.h, file.h, global.h, loadorder.h,
> etc should probably be moved to include/wine or their directory.
To include/wine no, to their respective dll directory yes, but you
will need to fix a lot of places that use them first.
> Alexandre, do you want patches to move these headers into their proper
> place? (if we can without the danger of having to move them again due to
> the current file reorganization)
Patches that actually clean up the header usage are OK; but patches
that just move headers around without addressing the issues of which
file includes which header are a waste of time.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
