Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I was sufficiently impressed with the Cygwin install > to think it wouldn't be that bad; if nothing else, I think > we should try to have both.
If we can support Cygwin without major trouble of course we should do it. But if the idea is to attract Windows developers, offering them a Unix environment may not be the best choice. > I would argue, that except perhaps for your objection to > my *.test format, that the framework as I have proposed would > be a good start. We can refine the Winelib stuff later. > > It seems to me that the alternate is to spend another five > weeks debating possible frameworks, and ending with none implemented. It's not really a question of debating frameworks, it's more a question of getting the building process into a useable form. I'm not going to create dozens of directories and spec files in the CVS tree pending a better solution. But I'll work on getting at least the Perl stuff into the tree, and then we can work on refining the C infrastructure. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
