"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It should be clear even for you, since you have submitted two different > patches with ordinal 201 assigned to absolutely different functions and > presumably both variants have worked for you. Apparently just adding > 100 stub OrdinalBase > should work for you too. > > Probably the right fix would be to add new parameter to the wine .spec > files: "ordinal base", because for WINSPOOL.DRV it's equal to 100 in all > variants of that DLL for me.
No, the right fix is the first one, adding a function at ordinal 100, since there is one under Windows. It should never be necessary to specify the ordinal base explicitly. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
