"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The Win32 API is meant to be used that way, and so we should test it. > Besides, I don't see why they are so ugly. Writing xxx instead of xxxA or > xxxW is not ugly in any stretch of the word.
What's ugly is that you don't compile what you write. This is the most sure recipe to make sure the code doesn't compile. People will test code in ASCII mode, and when some poor soul (like me ;-) tries to compile in Unicode mode to run regression tests it won't work because nobody ever tried to compile it that way. Or worse it will compile but not do what was intended because someone has been mixing char and tchar or whatever. xxxA and xxxW are different functions (and in fact do not necessarily behave the same way for all inputs), and they need to be tested independently. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
