At 07:54 AM 2/8/02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >3. If no combination of existing licenses will suffice, write a license >that does.
That would be the perfect solution. BUT, I think you didn't consider that there is a precondition that has to be fulfilled: Is it possible to make a license that fits all needs? That's the BIG IF in my opinion. And, as I wrote in my last message, at the moment I tend to think that there is no such license possible because the interests of the participants are antagonistic. To write it again we have two interests: 1. People who want to make money selling WINE or derivates == anti xGPL 2. People who contribute for free or have another business model than the above == pro xGPL Roland