Francois Gouget wrote: > Yes, you are supposed to implement xxxA by calling xxxW and not the > other way around. But historically, the xxxA functions have been > implemented first and the xxxW came later. And it's easier to just call > the xxxA function than to move all the code around to do things the > right way.
Good to know. :) > Still, the xxxW -> xxxA instances need to be fixed and they, slowly, > are. You are welcome to lend a hand. Ah! Currently I'm busy with implementing the boot handling of files. Takes a bit longer than I expected because I can't devote as much time as I thought.
