> I think it would be better to do it using a technique similar to how it > is done in scheduler/client.c on line 255: Makes sense to me - it wasn't obvious that msg_control and msg_accrights are always mutually exclusive, which is why I added a separate test... But if we're sure they are always mutally exclusive, this approach makes more sense... Warren
- Re: Patch - check for msghdr.msg_control on Sparc-Solaris Francois Gouget
- Warren_Baird