Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On October 14, 2002 11:16 am, Carlos wrote: > >>Then it has initted the bitmap, and with a SRCPAINT the result is >>correct, but if it hasn't passed by this point, when it uses SRCPAINT >>it mixes with the garbage in the buffer, because it wasn't cleared, >>then in this case SRCCOPY looks like correct. Maybe that it should be >>CLEAR+SRCAND+SRCPAINT? > > > You are correct, my mistake, I'm sorry. In fact, I just realized it > a little while after sending the message, and I just finished an > alternative patch (attached to this message). You are right, we should > just SRCCOPY the image if we don't have a solid background. My > patch just does a small code cleanup (and updates comments) to make > clear what we're doing. Can you please let me know if it works > as advertised? >
Works for me.