Eric Pouech wrote:
Actually, rm DOES have such an option:does rm have such an option ? rm doesn't, so I don't see any reason for
-i, --interactive
prompt before any removal
AND certain distros (RedHat for example) alias rm to "rm -i" by default.
Also, I stated that the command line parameter to wine would be required to even start the process - in other words, if you didn't supply it, you would not get the dialog, wine would just terminate.
AND, this would not necessarily have to be bloat in wine, it could be handled by a default wrapper - the wrapper checks UID and command flags, provides feedback if Wine needs to rebuild the font cache, etc.
You represent one extreme of the spectrum - "This isn't Wine's job, we shouldn't do anything."
The other side - "Wine should be safe. If things aren't safe, don't run", has also been represented here.
I'm just suggesting a middle ground.
