David Laight wrote:
Agreed. The question of (WCHAR)L'%' vs. '%' is really one of semantics. Yes, the "WCHAR" approach looks more complicated, but is potentially better to understand the "gist" of what it supposed to happen and what is required. You know that you are working with WCHARs instead of CHARs, complicating things but potentially making it more understandable...Remember '%' is an int constant.
Anyway, let me get back to fixing Dimitri's nigglies and stop worrying about semantics :)
