On November 6, 2002 02:24 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: > (you know how harsh and proficient I can be at flaming back, so better > don't challenge me ;-)))
So you're asserting your exclusive right to be harsh? :) > And yes, I certainly agree on removing it in case it is a problem > (unless it's really needed to make some programs work, and even then it > could be debated whether those programs that are broken enough to actually > need an original Win32s subsystem are *really* worth supporting). We agree then. Excellent. -- Dimi.