--- Sylvain Petreolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Excuse me if I feel scared, but is this Appdb or something else ?? > > > > No. It should be a group of applications tested by wine > > developers (or application mantainers) and what should work more > > or less flawless (without native dlls). It should be the screenshot > > section. > > In this case Appdb is already there, and only needs a maintainer. > No need to duplicate work. > > If you disagree, listen to what you wrote and compare it with Appdb > contents... > > b) A index page with a table: > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > | Name | Version | Status | > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > | Internet Explorer | 5.5 | XXX-- | > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > .... > > and a page for every application. >
Problem with using the AppDB is that it is highly disorganized, and most of the apps are non-working in there, his suggestion his that we only list 'officially' tested and working apps on this/these page(s) AFAICS.. -Dustin __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos http://launch.yahoo.com/u2