--- Vincent Béron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Le ven 08/11/2002 à 23:13, Sylvain Petreolle a écrit : > > We should test if the db2xxxx or docbook2xxxx binaries are > available so > > we could support both... > > configure is where to do that. You do it? :)
configure.ac and his neighboors are a mystery for me at the moment :) > > The unhiding of error messages is probably a good thing (especially > if > people report some problems). > But if we first determine which one is installed (eg db2html or > docbook2html), then what is the best way to handle the absence of any > of > those (aka "I can't build the doc")? Fully agreed. > > Last thing: make_winehq is not meant to build the documentation on a > general basis. make doc is for that, and the html files are now > correctly named with any one of the 2 patches I sent earlier (I think > the second one will get sent to wine-patches). There are some > differences between make_winehq and make doc: the first one buids > each guide separatly, then a big one comprising the four (5 > directories in total), and finally the same thing with another dsl, > while make doc only builds the big one. So we may want to add a make > target to build the different guides separately. But make_winehq is > not the right thing to call if you don't place the result on a website. Agreed. I must add one thing : make clean doesn't work for now. It removes *.tgz and others but the directories containing the old doc aren't removed. Neither does 'make doc'. wine-doc is moved to wine-doc.junk by jade and that's all. Or does it works with your patch ? Didn't have time to test it. ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com