Greg Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Still hoping for some guidance on this. I'm happy to get rid of > atomicity.c as you suggest, but less happy about duplicating the (to be > renamed) named_pipe_kludge_client.c unit. The prospect of keeping two > identical units in sync just rubs me the wrong way... it's so blatantly > non-orthagonal --- it seems, to me, that there must be a better way.
Do you really need the client connection stuff in rpcss? As far as I can tell it doesn't really do much, I'd suggest getting rid of it somehow, and having the client part only in rpcrt4 and the server part only in rpcss. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]