> > It is as if the code from your program is executing far > > slower than anything from libc! > > That is very well possible if he has the right libc. Take a look at the > optimizations in the string functions in glibc, and you'll have an idea > why. Unless you are a assembler programming Guru for a certain > architecture, you'll have a hard time beating them.
I'm a fairly good assembler programmer.... Actually I don't have glibc - I'm running netbsd not linux. Netbsd might benefit from faster strxxx routines. OTOH the times are very dependant on the cpu model! My slotA athlon 700 executes my str_add() faster the way I coded it - I tried the other order and it sucked. Similarly escaping with: lim[-1] = 0; return lim; didn't help. Of course you can use the same tricks as glibc does to speed up your own variant of the copy routine. David -- David Laight: [EMAIL PROTECTED]