"John K. Hohm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I posted my idea for representing the registration data, accidentally from > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" rather than my usual "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (see > http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/11/1409.html), but I haven't > gotten any responses, not even "looks fine" or "you are a moron". I guess I'll > just start submitting patches, then.
Sorry, I must have missed that one. I don't really like the ASCII description of the registry keys; I think it would be better to do it at a more symbolic level. For instance you shouldn't hardcode the ASCII form of the CLSID, you should have some kind of "register CLSID" function that takes a CLSID and uses StringFromCLSID or whatever to create the corresponding registry key. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]