On 26 Feb 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Yes, that's the way to do it, except it has to be implemented, not > stubbed out. The idea is that port.[ch] provides an emulation of the > missing functions so that people writing the code don't need to worry > about whether they exist or not. But if the replacement is broken then > we very much want the caller to be aware of that; which is why I put > the #ifdefs in wrc so that it's explicit that long options don't work > if configure didn't find getopt_long().
Of course, I just sent that patch in to see if that was the direction you wanted to go in. I was expecting, 'yeah, but implement that as well' :) Not a problem, now I know what you want, I'll try to find some time to do it. -- Dimi.
