"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I don't think that's a problem -- we need it only for the varargs > functions, the inlines work just as well for the vast majority of functions. > But if import libs are planned in the near future, what about just adding > a forward in the msvcrt.dll for the varargs functions, as a temporary bandaid?
This won't work, the forwarding needs to be done at link time, not at run time. Sure you can add the entry points to msvcrt, but then it won't be compatible with the native one. It seems to me the defines are fine as a bandaid too; do we have a real life case where the varargs functions are a problem? -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
