Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:I agree that it would better without a new thread state
as reported by Igor Sysoev on WD, exit process code wasn't properly implemented on *BSD it appeared (thanks Igor for all the testings and traces) that after terminate_process request was issued, the client/server pipe got closed because the running thread was actually killed, erasing the exit_code that terminate_process had set. This patch actually fixes it.
I don't think we need a new thread state just for that; how about something like this?
But it seems that in the case of a process termination with ExitProcess(0), your proposal will never set the exit code to 0 and always return an exit code of STILL_ACTIVE.
A+ -- Eric Pouech
