On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Francois Gouget wrote: > > > By site-wide one I suppose you mean the one shipped with DocBook? > > yes > > > We cannot do that because the DocBook one: > > 1. does not reference any css file > > So why is that a problem?
You do not want the HTML docs generated by 'make html' to look good? > > 2. does not use the %use-id-as-filename% option which results in ugly > > HTML filenames > > that's Their Problem (TM). You do not want the documentation generated by 'make html' to use sensible names? You want to tell users to do 'make html' and then open 'wine-user/x1483.html' (or maybe that's actually 'wine-devel/x1523.html') in their browser rather than 'wine-user/index.html'? [...] > So it does seem that people that want to build the stuff themselves > can use the default.dsl shipped with DocBook. If they want the docu > generated by us, they can just download it. You want to make like hard for anyone to use 'make html'? -- Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fgouget.free.fr/ Dieu dit: "M-x Lumière". Et la lumière fut.