On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On September 8, 2003 01:23 pm, Francois Gouget wrote: > > As far as I can see the differences between winehq.dsl and default .dsl > > Well, if we keep winehq.dsl, why do we need a perl script to patch > the output?
We need the perl script to remove everything outside the <body> tag and to put <!--TITLE:[Title Goes Here]--> as the first line. I'm pretty sure this could be done by hacking the dsl file and yes, this would be much better. But I'm sure haev no idea how and I don't have the time nor the will to spend days researching it. Since nobody else voluntered to do it either I wrote a script to hack the generated html file instead. > The HTML stuff should be generated with the site > default.dsl anyway. We should instead patch winehq.dsl to generate > the required output instead. And it should be moved to the tools/ > CVS module as well. Either way once make_winehq is in the tools CVS, winehq.dsl and make_winehq can be removed from Wine's CVS. However I think we should keep Wine's default.dsl file (just like we have a print.dsl file). -- Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fgouget.free.fr/ Stolen from an Internet user: "f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng !"