"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oleg has been doing a lot of good work, and we are now > down to 73 HeapReAlloc and 73 non-HeapReAlloc entries > to review. I'm still not sure how the comctl32.ReAlloc() > should behave, any help in getting that resolved would > be highly appreciated.
It seems comctl32.ReAlloc handles NULL properly, so the current implementation is correct. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]