Hi Sylvain, On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, [iso-8859-1] Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > > What settings are you using for wine? I don't see this problem with > > WRT, but I've only recently got it back up and running again. > What are the settings you want to know ?
~/.wine/config would be good. > > On a seperate note, some other strange things I've noticed: > > > > One of Monday night's patches seems to have broken a conformance test > > in listbox.c (line 123) but only for wine in win3.1-mode! Win3.1-mode > > also passes two todo tests (lines 129 and 134 both in the > > user/listbox.c). > Got same results here. Every emulated OS passes except win31. Good! I'm glad its not just me ... > > Also, does anyone else get orphaned zombie processes after running > > the regression tests? (which is moderately impressive: I thought init > > was supposed to clean these up) > > I get some zombies too, and the kernel notices it. This is what I have > in /var/log/messages: > Oct 30 10:44:18 wine kernel: application bug: wine(2120) has SIGCHLD > set to SIG_IGN but calls wait(). > Oct 30 10:44:18 wine kernel: (see the NOTES section of 'man 2 wait'). > Workaround activated. That's interesting. My syslog doesn't have any message like that. What kernel are you running? I'm using 2.6.0-test8 on quisquiliae. > Talking about the kernel process test, it seems they are runned more > than once, is it the normal way ? > ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M kernel32.dll -T ../../.. -p > kernel32_test.exe.so process.c && touch process.ok > tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. [12 idential lines follow] Yep, I get that (except I get 14 lines in total) when I take the -q option out. Cheers, Paul. ---- Paul Millar