On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 21:29, Vincent BÃron wrote: > Le mer 19/11/2003 Ã 15:24, Sylvain Petreolle a Ãcrit : > > --- Vincent BÃron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a Ãcrit : > > > What's the output of rpm -q prelink? > > > What's the output of ldd /usr/bin/wine (or anything dynamically > > > linked to libc)? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wine]$ rpm -q prelink > > package prelink is not installed > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wine]$ ldd /usr/local/bin/wine > > libwine.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libwine.so.1 (0x00111000) > > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x00c45000) > > libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x004e9000) > > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0090d000) > > libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00def000) > > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00ef9000) > > If prelink is not installed, what you see here is very much probably the > result of exec-shield. > Does repeating ldd on the same file yields the same results, or do they > differ each time? > I have the same configuration as Sylvain (RH9 -> Fedora Core 1) and I have the same behavior. When I do a ldd wine I have always the same result.
> > > > > Did you installed through an upgrade, or from scratch? > > It was an upgrade from RH 9 Shrike (athlon) to Fedora beta3 and upgrade > > via up2date. > I upgraded from RH9 to FC1 with the iso cds. > So you somehow ended up without prelink (which I thought was part of the > base install). Maybe that's a Fedora bug, but maybe not. > I do not have prelink installed too. > Vincent -- Maxime Bellengà <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>