On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:53:56 +0100, Sir olivier evalet scribed thus: > Hello, > I'm looking to create a default handler for these interfaces: > - IStorage
Hi, I think we already have an implementation for the OLE provided IStorage implementation. The others I'm not sure about. > The reason of this... I just want to display an OLE component without > binding with the native atl.dll. I have found a pure win32 example to > implement this. I don't understand, sorry. ATL is a set of C++ convenience wrappers around COM and is redistributable. All the infrastructure for displaying embedded OLE/AcitveX controls is already in Wine... do you think we're missing something? > So, If I want to use a "null" IStorage default handler, does there > already exist or I must implement it? Does OLE provide such a beast? I've never encountered it if so, only the standard compound document IStorage impl. If Windows provides an IStorage that goes to /dev/null we should implement that too. > As I can see in the source code, OLE is really hard for my head. Yes, it can be confusing. thanks -mike