--- Rein Klazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:31:45 -0800 (PST), you wrote: > > > ChangeLog: remove annoying message about missing > entry > > in /etc/services > > > > The behavior when the entry is missing is already > > correct, so the warning isn't useful. > > Well if that call fails on Wine+Linux but succeeds > on Windows I don't > call that correct, even if is not technically Wine > that is wrong. Point > is that there is no other place then inside Wine to > put this message.
I don't think the behavior is any different under Windows and Wine+Linux, that's why I felt the warning is useless. I just observed that Windows' netstat.exe prints port numbers (try 'wine -- netstat.exe -a') if the service isn't found, so it expects to deal with failure. MSDN documents the return value as NULL if the service isn't found, and this matches getservbyport(3). Ahh, I think I see your point: the Wine+Linux variant uses /etc/services, while Windows uses a file of the same format, but in a different location (system\services for Win9x, typically system32\drivers\etc\services for WinNT+). Is that right? In that case, I'm not sure what the correct behavior should be. On one hand, it doesn't match Windows' behavior 100% when using a real Windows install. On the other hand, it'll match native (Linux) programs' behavior on the same machine. Because a user (non-developer) can't take any action to correct this, I think the output is unnecessary. Point taken that at least a TRACE may be useful, though, since it's of use to developers. Or this there another reason I'm missing? --Juan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/