On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 02:28, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > This may cause some duplication, but it's always better to have two > implementations of something than to risk having none at all if it > turns out that you can't release the patch in the end.
OK, this is a good point. > Also make sure that you get the customer's agreement before releasing > anything; most likely if you are doing work for hire they own the > copyright and you can't release it without their permission (of course > once they distribute the result it has to be LGPL, but they don't > necessarily want to distribute it). I'll have to check on who owns the copyright, but in this case at least a stipulation of doing the work was that the changes would be merged back into Wine if possible, so that isn't a problem. thanks -mike
