Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just wondering whether there was a reason that the patch at > http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/11/0339.html was not > commited. My understanding of the ensuing debate was that it was > acceptable.
No, I'm afraid it's not. As I explained, you need to check that the file exists first. Also, DOSFS_GetFullName is called all over the place, so we need to go through all of them to make sure the behavior is correct; for instance your patch will break FindFirstFile since we have to allow wildcards there. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
