On December 5, 2003 12:38 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > We could also generate a test-by-test 'average', 'worst case' > or 'best case' mixture out of the (hopefully) several > submissions, of course.
This is what I was hopping we're gonna do. It doesn't seem right to pick the first one... We could try worst case, even though I'm afraid a test went bad for whatever reason will hide all the interesting results. I don't think it's that important. Let's pick the first one for now if that makes it simpler, and do the integration work (that's the hard part). Once that's done, we can tweak that table to our heart's content. -- Dimi.
