On December 4, 2003 04:36 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > I guess so, though I'm not sure how we should proceed. Maybe the first > step would be to get rid of the lstr* calls, and then to add them back > in a second step once every place has been checked.
Maybe we should come up with a bit more obvious names that are (1) easier to see are temporary and (2) easier to grep. Maybe a wl_/wstr_/wine_ prefix of sorts? -- Dimi.
