"Ge van Geldorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to be sure: if I understand you correctly you suggest doing the > LockResource16 in LoadAcceleratorsA/W, then GlobalAlloc a new block of > memory, copy the table to the new block and return the global memory > handle as the HACCEL. Then in IsAccelerator use GlobalLock to get at the > contents. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I was suggesting to avoid using GlobalAlloc16 in LoadAcceleratorsW at all, and use 32-bit GlobalAlloc instead. Alexandre answered another part of your message. And yes, you are right that support for sharing accelerator handles between processes will require complete rewrite of that code. -- Dmitry.
