On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:10:35 -0400, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > Cool. One small nit: for consistency, can we name it wineld instead? > Or is it winepreld more apropriate? I'm thinking that wineld will > seem to be the counterpart of winegcc...
In the tree I'm working on it'll be called wineclient, as the name we choose for this will be what appears in "ps ax". wineclient and wineserver seem to make more sense than seeing lots of "winepreld" processes, don't you think? thanks -mike
