Title: RE: WM_NEXTDLGCTL changes the default button ID and does not rest ore default control identifier

Alexandre,
Please find attached conformance test.

Thanks,
krishna
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexandre Julliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 12:34 PM
To: Krishna Murthy
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: FW: WM_NEXTDLGCTL changes the default button ID and does not rest ore default control identifier

Krishna Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Alexandre,
> Is these changes looks good? Do I have to submit this patch to
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ?

Well, I'm not really happy with it, that whole bSetDefID thing is fairly ugly IMO. I'd really appreciate if you could write a regression test that illustrates the behavior of both DM_SETDEFID and WM_NEXTDLGCTL so that the code can be restructured in a more readable way.

--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Attachment: defdlg.testpatch80385.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to