Chipzz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Much to my surprise, the wine implementation has more(!!) functions than > the native dll. So, I was wondering, this screws up the index of these > functions in the list, right? Does that index actually matter?
No, the index doesn't matter, the functions are looked up by name, so it's mostly a cosmetic issue; but it should probably still be fixed. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
