On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Rein Klazes wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:04:52 +0100, you wrote: > > Was this dropped? On my laptop (a 600mhz Pentium with 128mb of ram, so > > not too pokey) attempting to build the winetest binary actually kills > > the build dead. It ends up attempting to feed ~20mb of data to gas which > > doesn't make it very happy. I guess I misphrased it - it's not for > > slower machines, it's for machines with less memory. > > I have recently built wine on a P1-133 with 64MB of memory (with > success). > You should never be out of memory with enough swap.
In my case it is a free space on the "/" filesystem which I get running out of. Knowing the fact I like to live with a very small amount of a free space on the "/" I should complain only to myself. On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > There's not much reason to run the entire winetest binary on Wine > > itself, so why do we always build it ? > > Because code that doesn't get built rots very quickly. You can disable > it in your tree, but the default should be to build it. And how exactly can I disable it? By editing wineinstall script?
