On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:45:00PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 06:11:33PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: > > I couldn't find the patch at either of the two > > links Jesse posted, but I did see something similar here: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bk-commits-head&m=110048429304053&w=2 > > That's a brand new patch today. > > "x86: only single-step into signal handlers if the tracer asked for it." > > Looks like Linus may have been alerted by the problem and made this patch > just > in time for 2.6.10-rc2. Is this the "switch-off" we need? > > I'll be testing it shortly. >
It doesn't seem to fix the copy protection problem. So I'm wondering a few things. Does wine need to be patched? This new patch seems to be related to a chunk of code added in patch #2 mentioned in the original posting. I've tried 2.6.10-rc2 with patch #1 reversed and patch 1+3 reversed. No difference this time. Any idea will help. Jesse