On Tuesday 23 November 2004 14:07, Francois Gouget wrote: > What I meant is that we should check for one of these new APIs that we > need, and if we don't find it we should just do as if lcms.h was > missing.
Yes of course, I meant that too, and we should do that. But you presented this as a better solution for the breakage Gerald experienced than asking him to upgrade to lcms 1.13, which I don't agree with. Building as if lcms.h is missing would result in a mostly non-functional MSCMS dll and especially with him being the maintainer of the FreeBSD Wine port (IIRC) that could affect a large number of people. -Hans
