Le mar 23/11/2004 à 02:41, Shachar Shemesh a écrit : > Vincent Béron wrote: > > >So all this boils down to is that RH shipped a glibc update which broke > >backwards compatibility, with the same version number (glibc-2.3.2). A > >Wine compiled on the newer version takes advantage of epoll support > >being present, but will refuse to run on the older version. > > > Had only that been the case. The newer glibc has the "epoll" symbols, > but if you try to invoke them, they'll always return "not implemented". > It's one of the weirdest moves by RedHat I've seen.
Then why do we link to them if they simply return "not implemented"? As notepad works corectly with the newer glibc, I wonder if we do have a fallback to the poll branch (I thought it was a compile-time define). Vincent
