On Monday 17 January 2005 11:30, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would prefer to have all failed tests at the top, so one > > could see easily which ones need to be fixed. > > Not being an addition but a change, I'd like to hear others' > opinion on this matter. My personal feeling is that losing > alphabetical ordering on test names isn't worth it, as color > monitors are fairly common nowadays. So vote for the change!
I'd vote for tests staying in the same relative position from run to run (be that alphabetical or whatever). > > It would also be nice if the author of a test got an email > > whenever a test failed. > > Finding out the author of a test isn't easy, it requires > some digging into CVS. On the other hand, I'd choose an > opt-in method instead. But it's a separate project anyway, > the present machinery has pretty much nothing to facilitate > this. The summary.txt files are easy to parse and available > by HTTP, so one could use them to get the figures. One possibility is to send an email to the wine-devel list when something breaks (but only the one!). There were mixed reactions to this, for WRT, so I filtered all the emails and double-checked before forwarding them. Paul.
pgpzevwbAydWR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
