On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:29:00 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Jakob Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >I have to repeat again: Winword, Photoshop, Internet Explorer or any other > > >application I and most (if not all) developers and users are care about do > > >not > > >run on an invisible desktop, therefore I don't care about tests running in > > >that > > >mode at all. It's not simply an optional mode, that's a mode completely > > >useless > > >for vast majority of Wine users/developers. > > > > > > > > > > For example file APIs many applications depend upon, and these > > are totally unaffected by desktop visibility. > > We can't really separate the tests, but still want the tests to show > reasonable results in order to compare behaviour with Wine and to track > the regressions. I don't see the point of publishing broken tests, and > why running tests interactively can't be made a mandatory requirement. It certanly should be at least an option.
Ivan.