Would it not be just "<rant>" ?

XML -> HTML renders this to "<rant>", which the browser will render as 
"<rant>".

HTH,

Paul.

On Tuesday 08 Mar 2005 10:26, Francois Gouget wrote:
> In WWN 264 there's the following:
>
> &lt;rant&gt;
> ...
> &lt;/rant&gt;
>
> But it does not get through in the HTML page because it's getting
> transformed into <rant>...</rant> which the browser is correctly
> ignoring. We've had this problem before but I don't remember what the
> fix is... Do you?

Attachment: pgp7w9GdTKgxu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to