Augustus Saunders wrote: >As for what we hope to accomplish, well, it might seem like massive overkill to try using WINE, >but it's the only plausible way I've come up with. Basically, we want to substitute all the >graphics/windowing/GDI etc so that we can record all the painting/rendering into some kind of >WMF type thingy. The idea is to get screen captures as metafiles that are perfectly screen-accurate. >There are numerous ways to grab a bitmap rendering of a window/screen, but that's useless. Also, >you can (sometimes) get an application to print to your metafile, but that is for printing documents >and does not show the application as it appears on screen. The end result? Essentially vector >graphic screen shots.
I think what you are trying to do is actually API hooking. There are ways to do that as explained in older MS System Journals and most probably also on www.sysinternals.com. Alternatively I'm quite sure there is already some mechanisme built into Windows to do that. Two possible things come to my mind. If you make a screen capture with the "Print Screen" key, Windows seems to place a WMF or EMF format onto the clipboard already. And WMF/EMF is basically nothing more than a stream of GDI opcodes and its parameters as they are passed to the according GDI function. Alternatively you might want to look at how some of the recorder application do their work. I believe that there used to be a MSDN sample screen recorder application which might give you a start on how to do these things. Using Wine for this is most probably not very effective. You don't want to have DLLs reimplementing GDI and other low level Windows systems, and only forwarding all calls to the real system DLLs would mean modifying the Wine code to such an amount that Writing that code from scratch might be actually simpler. Rolf Kalbermatter