Shachar Shemesh wrote: MediaHost (TM) wrote:I understand, that wine needs still way to go and development time is not the cheapest thing on earth (A way to get more patches in:-)). Your suggestion concerning patches might be half correct: To hack up wine for certain needs and applications is, in my opinion, not the only qualification needed, it's one of them...Now, if you submitted a patch before, doesn't mean, you can give serious support for wine enabled solutions.... That's why I said, it's a dangerous thing to post such a list....why? To list anybody might work like a boomerang, if the listed entity is not capable of doing the job. This might be very counterproductive for wine and in effect make you look like a fool.... The intention is meant well, but still... And who is going to judge that issue?? Is money, little or much, the green card to winehq's supporting companies list?? Anyway, I see it as a problematic issue at large....and might do more harm than good.... But than again, the question remains, who to list!? Does submitting a patch qualify for better listing? I don't think there is any connection between them...coding is coding and support issues are something else.... --
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg
Company: StartCom Linux at www.startcom.org MediaHost™ at www.mediahost.org Skype: startcom Phone: +1.213.341.0390
Import StartCom Public CA
|
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature