Daniel Remenak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could I get some feedback on why this has not been applied? I've got > several additional patches prepared already that depend on it and if > something needs to be changed I'd like to know before I get even more > that do. It still applies cleanly to CVS. If it's just not being > applied because it's considered dead code I can submit the other > patches that actually use it.
That would be good. The pseudo vtbl functions that are not used in a vtbl don't look right to me, but I'm not sure what you are planning to do with that. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
