Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Should the same treatment be applied to the other functions too? > Examples: LZStart, LZInit, GetExpandedNameA, etc. > It's strange that winapi_check does not complain about them. > > Does it really work to declare LZDone as exported by multiple dlls in > a single comment? Should winapi_check scan the forwards and ask that > we mention them all in the relevant dll documentation?
It's probably better to only mention the dll that the code is in, the documentation for a dll function shouldn't have to know about other dlls that may forward to that function. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]