* On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Saulius Krasuckas wrote: > * On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Jeremy Newman wrote: > > * On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:43 +0100, Richard Cohen wrote: > > > > > > Dont't you mean text/x-patch? > > > > Right, I added both. Since some pass it as text/x-patch, and some pass > > text/x-diff. > > Works fine for me. Big thanks.
It stopped working nice for me again. The server returns "Content-Type: text/x-diff" in the HTTP headers, but somehow all my browsers started asking me about what should they do with such file. Any ideas, why? What have changed since then?
