Le lundi 03 octobre 2005 à 13:23 -0700, Dan Kegel a écrit : > On 10/3/05, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This method is already available in the form of checking out lostwages > > cvs, making changes, doing a diff, and sending in the patch to be > > accepted. The only difference is that anyone can make changes to > > lostwages this way (assuming they get committed). > > There is a certain lack of feedback in the process, though. > I did exactly what you suggested: > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-September/021063.html > but haven't heard back, nor has the change been committed.
I think it would be preferable to put these infos in the Wiki or in lostwages and avoid having resources at too much different places, it will just confuse users imho. I know you don't like Wikis, but it's just a matter of copy pasting your content. I can do it if you want. -- Jonathan Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
