--- Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > > * Monday, November 21, 2005, 4:54:56 PM, Ivan Leo > Puoti wrote: > > > Raphael Junqueira asked on bugzilla what the > safedisc status is. > > > Currently it works fine, and I believe what we > have is more or less > > > ready for CVS. However Vitaly told me Alexandre > didn't like the object > > > manager Vitaly wrote, mostly he didn't like > permanent objects, that > > > drivers depend on. > > > > Following Alexandre's suggestions I've managed to > get OM working without > > support for permanent objects. There will be some > modification required > > for ntoskrnl for that to work. I'm just about > finished integrating new > > OM into ntoskrnl tree and almost ready to give it > a try. > > > > As far as OM goes it's mostly finished and passes > all but two of om > > tests. Also it don't see any side-affects from it > either. All the > > programs I've tested work in the same way as they > were before. All named > > object moved to directories and using > RootDirectory part of > > OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES for create/open. > > > > Attached is the final revision of the directory > object implementation. > > If it looks ok I'm ready to send some patches <g> > > Any updates on this? What lefts to be done for > ntoskrnl to enter the > tree? :) > I've waited so long for this mythical ntoskrnl.exe that "doesn't change NtDeviceIoControl()" and "uses IPCs" to finally enter CVS. Can you please mail around a sample of the code so we have some idea of how on earth it works, I'm dying to know... Thank you Damjan __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com